Owning a small business is totally comparable to the American Revolution.
And you know, let’s say someone did actually make the argument Ramirez is stuffin in Obama’s mouth. The American revolution was the privileged tantrum of British settlers, who got their land and wealth from British Imperialism, but got angry when they were forced to pay more for a consumer commodity (tea). How is this somehow less valid than Ramirez et. co.’s birlliant argument that “herp derp Occupy protestors have clothes made by corporations, hypocrites!”.
Also, Michael, yes, we got it. You have a boner for redrawing classical paintings of the mythical early America. Because a time when Africans were considered three fitfhs a human being, the grand declaration of self-evident truths and freedoms only applied to white, land-owning men, and people still could seriously argue that they had a manifest destiny to steal an entire continent and kill its inhabitants. I guess he would be home at that time.